Daniela M. Pfabigan<p>New <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/preprint" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>preprint</span></a> with <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.nu/@UtaSailer" class="u-url mention">@<span>UtaSailer</span></a></span> and Franz Wurm<br /> 👇<br />We replicate findings of the probabilistic reward task (PRT) in a large online sample (N = 305), while no processing advantages for social over non-social <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/FeedbackStimuli" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>FeedbackStimuli</span></a> occurred ...<br /><a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/RewardResponsiveness" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>RewardResponsiveness</span></a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/DDM" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>DDM</span></a></p><p><a href="https://psyarxiv.com/zm6gj" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">psyarxiv.com/zm6gj</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p>Our PRT findings suggest that different social and non-social stimuli can serve equally well as reinforcers without affecting the expected response preference- making the PRT a very robust experimental paradigm</p>